Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Misi JIPAMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat adalah untuk menjadi jurnal interdisipliner peer-review terkemuka untuk memajukan teori dan praktik yang terkait dengan semua bentuk penjangkauan. Ini termasuk menyoroti upaya inovatif; memeriksa secara kritis masalah, tren, tantangan, dan peluang yang muncul; dan pelaporan tentang studi dampak di bidang layanan publik, penjangkauan, keterlibatan, penyuluhan, penelitian yang terlibat, penelitian berbasis komunitas, penelitian partisipatif berbasis komunitas, penelitian tindakan, beasiswa publik, pembelajaran layanan, dan pengabdian masyarakat.

Fokus

JIPAMA bertujuan untuk menyediakan forum bagi peneliti internasional tentang Pengembangan dan Keterlibatan Masyarakat terapan untuk menerbitkan artikel asli.

Cakupan

Ruang lingkup JIPAMA adalah:

  • Perkembangan sosial
  • Humaniora
  • Teknologi Informasi
  • Pendidikan
  • Teknologi Terapan
  • Kebijakan yang Diterapkan
  • Kewiraswastaan

Jurnal ini memuat hasil-hasil pengabdian masyarakat berbasis penelitian seperti PAR (Participatory Action Research), ABCD (Asset-Based Community Development), CBR (Community-Based Research), Service Learning, Community Development, dan metodologi lainnya.

JIPAMA menerima kiriman dari seluruh dunia. Semua artikel yang diterima akan diterbitkan dengan pembayaran biaya pemrosesan artikel dan akan tersedia gratis untuk semua pembaca dengan visibilitas dan cakupan di seluruh dunia.

------

The mission of JIPAMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat is to serve as the premier peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal to advance theory and practice related to all forms of outreach. This includes highlighting innovative endeavors; critically examining emerging issues, trends, challenges, and opportunities; and reporting on studies of impact in the areas of public service, outreach, engagement, extension, engaged research, community-based research, community-based participatory research, action research, public scholarship, service-learning, and community service.

Focus

JIPAMA aims to provide a forum for international researchers on applied Society Development and Engagement to publish the original articles.

Scope

The scope of JIPAMA are:

  • Social Development
  • Humaniora
  • Information Technology
  • Education
  • Applied Technology
  • Applied Policy
  • Entrepreneurship

This journal contains research-based community service results such as PAR (Participatory Action Research), ABCD (Asset-Based Community Development), CBR (Community-Based Research), Service Learning, Community Development, and other methodologies.

JIPAMA accept submission from all over the world. All accepted articles will be published on payment of an article-processing charge and will be freely available to all readers with worldwide visibility and coverage.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Semua kiriman ke jurnal JIPAMA terlebih dahulu ditinjau kelengkapannya dan baru kemudian dikirim untuk dinilai oleh Editor yang akan memutuskan apakah cocok untuk peer review. Jika seorang Editor termasuk dalam daftar penulis atau memiliki kepentingan lain yang bersaing mengenai naskah tertentu, anggota Dewan Editorial lainnya akan ditugaskan untuk mengawasi tinjauan sejawat. Editor akan mempertimbangkan laporan peer-review saat membuat keputusan, tetapi tidak terikat oleh opini atau rekomendasi di dalamnya. Kekhawatiran yang diangkat oleh satu peer reviewer atau Editor sendiri dapat mengakibatkan manuskrip ditolak. Penulis menerima laporan tinjauan sejawat dengan keputusan editorial pada naskah mereka.

Makalah prosiding ditinjau oleh Ketua Program dan anggota Komite Program dari masing-masing konferensi, dengan bantuan dari peninjau eksternal yang dipilih oleh mereka.

-----

All submissions to JIPAMA journals are first reviewed for completeness and only then sent to be assessed by an Editor who will decide whether they are suitable for peer review. Where an editor is on the author list or has any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to oversee the peer review. Editors will consider the peer-reviewed reports when making a decision but are not bound by the opinions or recommendations therein. A concern raised by a single peer reviewer or the Editor themself may result in the manuscript being rejected. Authors receive peer review reports with the editorial decision on their manuscript.

Proceedings papers are reviewed by the Programme Chairs and Programme Committee members of the respective conference, with help from external reviewers selected by them.

 

Publication Frequency

JIPAMA terbit 3 kali dalam setahun.  JIPAMA terbit bulan Maret, July, dan November. Setiap terbitan terdiri dari minimum 5 artikel dan maksimum 9 artikel.

JIPAMA is published 3 times a year. JIPAMA is published in March, July, and November. Each issue consists of a minimum of 5 articles and a maximum of 9 articles.


 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

Code of ethics statement is based on the scientific publication LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 on the Code of Ethics of Scientific Publications and COPE, which upholds 3 ethics in publications, namely: (i) the neutrality, clear of conflicts of interest in the publication processing; (ii) justice, giving the author the right to claim his paper; and (iii) Honesty, clearly from duplication, fabrication, forgery, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. The review process is blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Responsibilities of editors

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely on the papers’ importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.

Responsibilities of the authors

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer-review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Responsibilities of the Reviewers

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviewers must review articles according to their field of expertise
  3. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  4. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  5. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  6. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  8. The reviewer must provide recommendations on the results of the article review